<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Veterans receive help from Rockwall&#8217;s Foreclosure Angel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therockwallnews.com/2009/1106/living/foreclosure-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therockwallnews.com/2009/1106/living/foreclosure-2?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=foreclosure-2</link>
	<description>Rockwall County&#039;s best-read news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:53:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gale Daft</title>
		<link>http://therockwallnews.com/2009/1106/living/foreclosure-2/comment-page-1#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>Gale Daft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 07:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therockwallnews.com/?p=3641#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>Hi, came to this webpage from Yahoo and just wanted to say thanks for the informational article you have written about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, came to this webpage from Yahoo and just wanted to say thanks for the informational article you have written about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puhleeseStop</title>
		<link>http://therockwallnews.com/2009/1106/living/foreclosure-2/comment-page-1#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>puhleeseStop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therockwallnews.com/?p=3641#comment-818</guid>
		<description>Never argue with an idiot, lest a casual observer think it&#039;s just two idiots arguing............you folks need to carry this on in a bar or a hotel room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never argue with an idiot, lest a casual observer think it&#8217;s just two idiots arguing&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;you folks need to carry this on in a bar or a hotel room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Dowd</title>
		<link>http://therockwallnews.com/2009/1106/living/foreclosure-2/comment-page-1#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Dowd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therockwallnews.com/?p=3641#comment-813</guid>
		<description>IMPORTANT CORRECTION TO Ms. Dowdâ€™s input:  Paragraph 13, Line 5, should be corrected as follows:  Instead of saying &quot;Accounting Customer tried to force-place ANOTHER kind of insurance that Customer did not needâ€¦&quot; It should have read, &quot;MS tried to force-place ANOTHER kind of insurance that Customer did not need...â€ EXPLAINATION:  MS means Mortgage Server, The MS&#039;s job is to do the accounting on the loan...the MS is not the Lender for the loan, merely the accountant.... this accounting firm is well-known, therefore most people think of them as the Lender....So in my response I had called them the &quot;accounting company&quot;...BUT after Jeff&#039;s comments, I change their identification in my writing from &quot;accounting&quot; to Mortgage Server, so we could all be on the same page.  Please make the correction; it is important to understanding the case.  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMPORTANT CORRECTION TO Ms. Dowdâ€™s input:  Paragraph 13, Line 5, should be corrected as follows:  Instead of saying &#8220;Accounting Customer tried to force-place ANOTHER kind of insurance that Customer did not needâ€¦&#8221; It should have read, &#8220;MS tried to force-place ANOTHER kind of insurance that Customer did not need&#8230;â€ EXPLAINATION:  MS means Mortgage Server, The MS&#8217;s job is to do the accounting on the loan&#8230;the MS is not the Lender for the loan, merely the accountant&#8230;. this accounting firm is well-known, therefore most people think of them as the Lender&#8230;.So in my response I had called them the &#8220;accounting company&#8221;&#8230;BUT after Jeff&#8217;s comments, I change their identification in my writing from &#8220;accounting&#8221; to Mortgage Server, so we could all be on the same page.  Please make the correction; it is important to understanding the case.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn</title>
		<link>http://therockwallnews.com/2009/1106/living/foreclosure-2/comment-page-1#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 06:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therockwallnews.com/?p=3641#comment-800</guid>
		<description>Your comments, Jeff, prove to me once again that many people like yourself value only money and not compassion.  Your own selfworth must be composed of only money which I truly feel sorry for you.  Someday, let us hope, that you never have anything happen in your life where you are in need and others like yourself walk by.  Try to use this new year to put yourself into others shoes for a change.  I hope your paper you gather legally or illegally fulfill that void.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comments, Jeff, prove to me once again that many people like yourself value only money and not compassion.  Your own selfworth must be composed of only money which I truly feel sorry for you.  Someday, let us hope, that you never have anything happen in your life where you are in need and others like yourself walk by.  Try to use this new year to put yourself into others shoes for a change.  I hope your paper you gather legally or illegally fulfill that void.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Dowd</title>
		<link>http://therockwallnews.com/2009/1106/living/foreclosure-2/comment-page-1#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Dowd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therockwallnews.com/?p=3641#comment-799</guid>
		<description>Ms. Marilyn we were not going to be drawn to comment by negative feedback, but you should not have to endure abuse by Jeff, Jeff is very proud that he won his own case against this same company and when he heard about ours he jumped at the chance to help, he has a â€œknackâ€ for law and really appears pretty good, he had planed to launch his career on this case, but Jeff also has a temper and tends to lash out now and apologize later.  Please donâ€™t take it personal, his comments are not really directed towards neither you or me, itâ€™s to his old partners, this was their best case and he simply went to the other side to get evenâ€¦now we are caught in the crossfire.  Putting all feelings aside, Jeff should have been an attorney, he loves the law and does very careful research, and though he is angry he still says we should have won a settlement in this case, he even describes what the settlement should have been!
Thank you Ms. Marilyn for allowing us the opportunity to share our storyâ€¦we admire how you gave someone their home backâ€¦we did â€œbigâ€ things like that for others before this happened. (Public record)

Ms. Marilyn you are correct; there is much corruption in this case and itâ€™s on the part of the Mortgage Server (MS) attorneys, and the â€œbailed outâ€ MS should be held accountable for allowing these attorneys to turn a $465 dollar mistake on a $50,000 dollar property into a $500,000.00 (1/2 million dollar legal bill!  Notice that none of the writers dispute the facts of the case, AND all unanimously states, the Dowds should gain settlement; meaning they ALL agree; this is a wrongful foreclosure and there are damages!   

The settlement that Jeff describes would have been idealâ€¦ we are business people who just want to get our lives back, we know how to cut our losses and move on, business people would not put themselves through this, like Jeff saidâ€¦but after the Attorneyâ€™s took over from the MS representatives we never heard of a settlement.
Wow, to have â€œnegotiated fair settlement obtained on the Dowdâ€™s behalfâ€¦â€ Jeffâ€™s comments, reminded me how he use to say, â€œthey are holding your credit rating hostage, like ransomâ€.  Jeff said he believed they were using our credit as their â€œnegotiating toolâ€ to make us drop the case!  
Jeffâ€™s objective investigation verifies, for the readers, that the MS did report â€œDEROGATORY credit informationâ€¦to the credit bureausâ€ Itâ€™s amazing how MS can get away with thisâ€¦actually holding, â€œthe ability to change their wrongly-reported credit informationâ€¦ over your head,â€ until you submitâ€¦AND they KNOW they had reported false information! This has to be an abuse of power!  This can happen to anyone, by a large or small business!  
The more our nation considers our credit in our everyday lifeâ€¦ for insurance, jobs, homeownership, veteran benefits, .the list keeps growingâ€¦the more serious this is.!!!  For any company to refuse to correct â€œderogatory credit informationâ€â€¦think about itâ€¦Jeff makes a good point.

Unfortunately, the Dowds are not in control of settling this matter; the MS allowed their Attorneys to handle this matter, â€œuncheckedâ€, and these Attorneys WONâ€™T settleâ€¦they are â€œmilkingâ€ this MS, and the â€œgovernment bailed-outâ€ MS officials obviously doesnâ€™t care, herein, lays the corruption!   And these Attorneys will not let us out of the situation either! 

After 6-years of suffering from the MSâ€™s acknowledged error, we, the Dowds have tried to file bankruptcyâ€¦we never dreamed we would be in bankruptcy, but our credit is destroyed so, having bankruptcy on our record canâ€™t hurt us, nowâ€¦but somehow the MSâ€™s Attorneys have managed to drag this bankruptcy matter out too!  It has been 6-months so far just trying to get the initial paperwork started; they dragged out month-by-monthâ€¦people familiar with bankruptcy say this is unheard ofâ€¦itâ€™s corruption!

We were told that bankruptcy is a Federal matter and is handled by Federal courts, but somehow the MSâ€™s Attorneys have managed to have this bankruptcy matter handled at the District Court level, to their financial advantage; sounds like corruption! 

Ms. Marilyn, here are the facts stated generically, to let your readers be the judge: 

â€œDuring 2004, a Mortgage Lender made a Customer, (a Retired 40yr-military-couple turned investor) with 750-credit score, TWO-$50 thousand dollar mortgage loans, in March and May. Upon closing, each was assigned to the same MS, (two-months apart).   (There is Proof)

Inadvertently, the MS co-mingled the two files and made several posting errors to both accounts, particularly within the insurance department.  (There is Proof)

After a year of phone calls, faxes, letters, statements written on payment check, etcâ€¦ the MS realized/acknowledged a $465 dollar insurance error on their partâ€¦(they also realized that a year of ignoring the Customerâ€™s explanations, had resulted in the filing of 10-months of negative credit reports, which caused obvious damage to Customerâ€™s credit rating.)  (There is Proof)

Instead of repairing the damage, by correcting credit reportsâ€¦the MS spent yet another year, entire 2005, attempting to cover up the first error, (verified in Deposition given by MS representative, &quot;at the tail end&quot;), daily harassing the Customer (verified by supeoned phone records, 7-days per week from 0600-2300hrs.) and continuing negative credit reporting (Oct 04-Mar 06). (There is Proof)  In the mean time, because of fraudulent credit reporting Customer had to cancel several other business investment opportunities, waiting, in hopes that the MS would clear up the matter, as verified by Jeff&#039;s comments.

After the 2-years of backtracking, and trying to cover up errors didnâ€™t work, the MS decided to wrongfully foreclose against the Customerâ€™s property, in 2006.  Helpless Customer cries and prays. Then, some regular citizens who have a vision to help victims of wrongful-foreclosures found the Customerâ€™s case in the public court records, and contacted the Customer. They listened to the situation and offered to help by getting caring attorneys involved.  

These regular citizens said that they could only help one-percent (1%) of foreclosure cases because usually there are gray areas; they scrutinized every aspect of this matter, forensically proving this case has no gray areas, it was pretty simple:  MS had co-mingled the filesâ€¦so, on one property MS said Customer didnâ€™t have insurance, they force-placed it and increased the payments, and when MS realized Customer really DID have insurance alreadyâ€¦to cover caused damagesâ€¦Accounting Customer tried to force-place ANOTHER kind of insurance that Customer did not needâ€¦ and again, they increased the payments. Customer continued to make all the regular payments on time.  But, MS filed for foreclosure even though several official records proved that Customer did not need the â€œextraâ€ insurance.  MSâ€™s error and fraudulent credit reporting destroyed Customerâ€™s business and robbed Customer of life-long earned benefits. (Boxes of legal documents as proof)  

FYI: At the onset of this wrongful foreclosure, these â€œregular citizensâ€ had personal hopes that ranged from â€œwanting to see justice servedâ€¦ to launching new careersâ€ all resulting from their efforts to help the Customer (using this â€œfor sureâ€ case); who was a victim of this â€œwrong practiceâ€.  Instead, they have endured much abuse, slander, threats, backbiting and criminal activity against themâ€¦. these â€œregular citizensâ€ have not profited in any manner, in fact, some have suffered loss.  Only the â€œbailed-outâ€ MSâ€™s Attorneys have benefited from this situation.  (Re: the comments)

In 2007, in the presence of Attorneys for both sides, within the first 15-minutes, Mediation confirmed the MSâ€™s mistake and the Customerâ€™s efforts to inform the MS of the error. So, the â€œflown-inâ€ MSâ€™s Representatives wanted to resolve the matter quickly and continue the business relationshipâ€¦the MS and Customer immediately established amicable email-contracts to decide the matter.  (There is email proof)

Days after Mediation, corruption entersâ€¦ the MSâ€™s Attorneys tell the MSâ€™s Representatives they must stop all contact with the Customer; and by using the â€œslow-process of the court systemâ€, the MSâ€™s Attorneys have managed to drag this simple (resolved) case out for 4 more years, 2010.  Corruption!!

During the 4-years of legal battles, the Customer repeatedly re-proves that the MS was wrongâ€¦ on every front (at Mediation, to the District Judge, at Arbitration).  The Customer paid for several depositions, and the â€œregular citizensâ€ collected letters from County, City, State and National officials.  (There is proof) 
Since MSâ€™s attorneysâ€™ could not prove this case on facts, therefore, their final concluding written statement states essentiallyâ€¦â€œWhen all else fail, we can do what we want to doâ€â€¦ (Public record.)  Jeff verifies this by reciting it in his commentsâ€¦the Dowds CANNOT understand how MS can get away with this!  Again, this can happen to anyone!
At the time of this writing, the MS and their unscrupulous Attorneys have won; they have proven that money, influence and intimidation WILL allow you to get away with making detrimental mistakes and dealing falsely with Customers. (Case in point)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Marilyn we were not going to be drawn to comment by negative feedback, but you should not have to endure abuse by Jeff, Jeff is very proud that he won his own case against this same company and when he heard about ours he jumped at the chance to help, he has a â€œknackâ€ for law and really appears pretty good, he had planed to launch his career on this case, but Jeff also has a temper and tends to lash out now and apologize later.  Please donâ€™t take it personal, his comments are not really directed towards neither you or me, itâ€™s to his old partners, this was their best case and he simply went to the other side to get evenâ€¦now we are caught in the crossfire.  Putting all feelings aside, Jeff should have been an attorney, he loves the law and does very careful research, and though he is angry he still says we should have won a settlement in this case, he even describes what the settlement should have been!<br />
Thank you Ms. Marilyn for allowing us the opportunity to share our storyâ€¦we admire how you gave someone their home backâ€¦we did â€œbigâ€ things like that for others before this happened. (Public record)</p>
<p>Ms. Marilyn you are correct; there is much corruption in this case and itâ€™s on the part of the Mortgage Server (MS) attorneys, and the â€œbailed outâ€ MS should be held accountable for allowing these attorneys to turn a $465 dollar mistake on a $50,000 dollar property into a $500,000.00 (1/2 million dollar legal bill!  Notice that none of the writers dispute the facts of the case, AND all unanimously states, the Dowds should gain settlement; meaning they ALL agree; this is a wrongful foreclosure and there are damages!   </p>
<p>The settlement that Jeff describes would have been idealâ€¦ we are business people who just want to get our lives back, we know how to cut our losses and move on, business people would not put themselves through this, like Jeff saidâ€¦but after the Attorneyâ€™s took over from the MS representatives we never heard of a settlement.<br />
Wow, to have â€œnegotiated fair settlement obtained on the Dowdâ€™s behalfâ€¦â€ Jeffâ€™s comments, reminded me how he use to say, â€œthey are holding your credit rating hostage, like ransomâ€.  Jeff said he believed they were using our credit as their â€œnegotiating toolâ€ to make us drop the case!<br />
Jeffâ€™s objective investigation verifies, for the readers, that the MS did report â€œDEROGATORY credit informationâ€¦to the credit bureausâ€ Itâ€™s amazing how MS can get away with thisâ€¦actually holding, â€œthe ability to change their wrongly-reported credit informationâ€¦ over your head,â€ until you submitâ€¦AND they KNOW they had reported false information! This has to be an abuse of power!  This can happen to anyone, by a large or small business!<br />
The more our nation considers our credit in our everyday lifeâ€¦ for insurance, jobs, homeownership, veteran benefits, .the list keeps growingâ€¦the more serious this is.!!!  For any company to refuse to correct â€œderogatory credit informationâ€â€¦think about itâ€¦Jeff makes a good point.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the Dowds are not in control of settling this matter; the MS allowed their Attorneys to handle this matter, â€œuncheckedâ€, and these Attorneys WONâ€™T settleâ€¦they are â€œmilkingâ€ this MS, and the â€œgovernment bailed-outâ€ MS officials obviously doesnâ€™t care, herein, lays the corruption!   And these Attorneys will not let us out of the situation either! </p>
<p>After 6-years of suffering from the MSâ€™s acknowledged error, we, the Dowds have tried to file bankruptcyâ€¦we never dreamed we would be in bankruptcy, but our credit is destroyed so, having bankruptcy on our record canâ€™t hurt us, nowâ€¦but somehow the MSâ€™s Attorneys have managed to drag this bankruptcy matter out too!  It has been 6-months so far just trying to get the initial paperwork started; they dragged out month-by-monthâ€¦people familiar with bankruptcy say this is unheard ofâ€¦itâ€™s corruption!</p>
<p>We were told that bankruptcy is a Federal matter and is handled by Federal courts, but somehow the MSâ€™s Attorneys have managed to have this bankruptcy matter handled at the District Court level, to their financial advantage; sounds like corruption! </p>
<p>Ms. Marilyn, here are the facts stated generically, to let your readers be the judge: </p>
<p>â€œDuring 2004, a Mortgage Lender made a Customer, (a Retired 40yr-military-couple turned investor) with 750-credit score, TWO-$50 thousand dollar mortgage loans, in March and May. Upon closing, each was assigned to the same MS, (two-months apart).   (There is Proof)</p>
<p>Inadvertently, the MS co-mingled the two files and made several posting errors to both accounts, particularly within the insurance department.  (There is Proof)</p>
<p>After a year of phone calls, faxes, letters, statements written on payment check, etcâ€¦ the MS realized/acknowledged a $465 dollar insurance error on their partâ€¦(they also realized that a year of ignoring the Customerâ€™s explanations, had resulted in the filing of 10-months of negative credit reports, which caused obvious damage to Customerâ€™s credit rating.)  (There is Proof)</p>
<p>Instead of repairing the damage, by correcting credit reportsâ€¦the MS spent yet another year, entire 2005, attempting to cover up the first error, (verified in Deposition given by MS representative, &#8220;at the tail end&#8221;), daily harassing the Customer (verified by supeoned phone records, 7-days per week from 0600-2300hrs.) and continuing negative credit reporting (Oct 04-Mar 06). (There is Proof)  In the mean time, because of fraudulent credit reporting Customer had to cancel several other business investment opportunities, waiting, in hopes that the MS would clear up the matter, as verified by Jeff&#8217;s comments.</p>
<p>After the 2-years of backtracking, and trying to cover up errors didnâ€™t work, the MS decided to wrongfully foreclose against the Customerâ€™s property, in 2006.  Helpless Customer cries and prays. Then, some regular citizens who have a vision to help victims of wrongful-foreclosures found the Customerâ€™s case in the public court records, and contacted the Customer. They listened to the situation and offered to help by getting caring attorneys involved.  </p>
<p>These regular citizens said that they could only help one-percent (1%) of foreclosure cases because usually there are gray areas; they scrutinized every aspect of this matter, forensically proving this case has no gray areas, it was pretty simple:  MS had co-mingled the filesâ€¦so, on one property MS said Customer didnâ€™t have insurance, they force-placed it and increased the payments, and when MS realized Customer really DID have insurance alreadyâ€¦to cover caused damagesâ€¦Accounting Customer tried to force-place ANOTHER kind of insurance that Customer did not needâ€¦ and again, they increased the payments. Customer continued to make all the regular payments on time.  But, MS filed for foreclosure even though several official records proved that Customer did not need the â€œextraâ€ insurance.  MSâ€™s error and fraudulent credit reporting destroyed Customerâ€™s business and robbed Customer of life-long earned benefits. (Boxes of legal documents as proof)  </p>
<p>FYI: At the onset of this wrongful foreclosure, these â€œregular citizensâ€ had personal hopes that ranged from â€œwanting to see justice servedâ€¦ to launching new careersâ€ all resulting from their efforts to help the Customer (using this â€œfor sureâ€ case); who was a victim of this â€œwrong practiceâ€.  Instead, they have endured much abuse, slander, threats, backbiting and criminal activity against themâ€¦. these â€œregular citizensâ€ have not profited in any manner, in fact, some have suffered loss.  Only the â€œbailed-outâ€ MSâ€™s Attorneys have benefited from this situation.  (Re: the comments)</p>
<p>In 2007, in the presence of Attorneys for both sides, within the first 15-minutes, Mediation confirmed the MSâ€™s mistake and the Customerâ€™s efforts to inform the MS of the error. So, the â€œflown-inâ€ MSâ€™s Representatives wanted to resolve the matter quickly and continue the business relationshipâ€¦the MS and Customer immediately established amicable email-contracts to decide the matter.  (There is email proof)</p>
<p>Days after Mediation, corruption entersâ€¦ the MSâ€™s Attorneys tell the MSâ€™s Representatives they must stop all contact with the Customer; and by using the â€œslow-process of the court systemâ€, the MSâ€™s Attorneys have managed to drag this simple (resolved) case out for 4 more years, 2010.  Corruption!!</p>
<p>During the 4-years of legal battles, the Customer repeatedly re-proves that the MS was wrongâ€¦ on every front (at Mediation, to the District Judge, at Arbitration).  The Customer paid for several depositions, and the â€œregular citizensâ€ collected letters from County, City, State and National officials.  (There is proof)<br />
Since MSâ€™s attorneysâ€™ could not prove this case on facts, therefore, their final concluding written statement states essentiallyâ€¦â€œWhen all else fail, we can do what we want to doâ€â€¦ (Public record.)  Jeff verifies this by reciting it in his commentsâ€¦the Dowds CANNOT understand how MS can get away with this!  Again, this can happen to anyone!<br />
At the time of this writing, the MS and their unscrupulous Attorneys have won; they have proven that money, influence and intimidation WILL allow you to get away with making detrimental mistakes and dealing falsely with Customers. (Case in point)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Beyer</title>
		<link>http://therockwallnews.com/2009/1106/living/foreclosure-2/comment-page-1#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Beyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therockwallnews.com/?p=3641#comment-783</guid>
		<description>Marilyn, I prevailed in my foreclosure suit.  You can take a look for yourself.  It is a matter of public record.  CJ-2003-533 in Canadian County District Court.   Look through some of the pleadings in that case and you will see the level of expertise that I have in the area of consumer law in Oklahoma.  Ask the Honorable Judge Cunningham what his opinion is of my legal expertise.  

























































Mayilyn, why don&#039;t you put your money where your mouth is and bail the Dowd&#039;s out.  If you think they got such a raw deal, why not have your foundation write a check and pay off the Dowd&#039;s mortgage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilyn, I prevailed in my foreclosure suit.  You can take a look for yourself.  It is a matter of public record.  CJ-2003-533 in Canadian County District Court.   Look through some of the pleadings in that case and you will see the level of expertise that I have in the area of consumer law in Oklahoma.  Ask the Honorable Judge Cunningham what his opinion is of my legal expertise.  </p>
<p>Mayilyn, why don&#8217;t you put your money where your mouth is and bail the Dowd&#8217;s out.  If you think they got such a raw deal, why not have your foundation write a check and pay off the Dowd&#8217;s mortgage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marilyn</title>
		<link>http://therockwallnews.com/2009/1106/living/foreclosure-2/comment-page-1#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>marilyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therockwallnews.com/?p=3641#comment-782</guid>
		<description>When there are so many wanting to slam this one family, you know there is total corruption going on.  How was your own bankruptcy/foreclosure going Jeff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When there are so many wanting to slam this one family, you know there is total corruption going on.  How was your own bankruptcy/foreclosure going Jeff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Beyer</title>
		<link>http://therockwallnews.com/2009/1106/living/foreclosure-2/comment-page-1#comment-763</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Beyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therockwallnews.com/?p=3641#comment-763</guid>
		<description>The only shameful event in this Dowd situation is the fact that Mrs. Dowd had no faith in her own system of investing in rental properties.  Having been involved in their arbitration matter, as discovery progressed, it became overwhelming clear that they had absolutely no facts to back their claims.   Mrs. Dowd alleged she could not purchase other properties as a result of her credit being allegedly ruined by her mortgage servicer.  The facts came out that she had actually asked in writing to be let out of one purchase contract so she could get her deposit back.   Mrs. Dowd never told anyone about this up front.  Her only witness to her alleged credit destruction was a former mortgage broker that could not recall dates or times or events with reasonable accuracy.  A negotiated fair settlement obtained on the Dowd&#039;s behalf in their arbitration would have removed all the derogatory credit information that her mortgage servicer had reported to the credit bureaus, the payment of her former attorney fees, a re-instatement of her mortgage loan and a cash payment on top of it all.  Mr. Dowd wanted to accept the offer and move on with their lives.  Mrs. Dowd refused as she wanted substantially more.   Mrs. Dowd was listening to her so called &quot;expert&quot; that was insisting they could get more.  This expert holds herself out to be a certified fraud examiner when in fact, she is nothing more than a fraud herself.  I have never seen a so called expert so misguided and uninformed in her area of expertise.  Her arrogant attitude combined with her lack of knowledge is why she has been discredited in numerous courts.   This certified fraud examiner continually ascertains opinions that are beyond her scope of knowledge and experience.  She is the result of why the Dowd&#039;s lost their arbitration matter and the foreclosure suit in district court.  Her conclusions and facts were all wrong.













Had Mrs. Dowd had faith in her investment business, she could have taken the settlement and moved on and continued to purchase other investment properties and forget about getting rich in litigation. 



















































The Dowd&#039;s foreclosure is not on their personnel residence, but is on an investment rental property of which they own others.  Their personnel residence is not at risk.  










The Dowd&#039;s and their certified fraud examiner cannot seem to understand that what underlies this entire foreclosure is a note and mortgage which clearly spells out the responsibilities of each party.  The foreclosure was the result of the mortgage servicer doing exactly what they were allowed to pursuant to the note and the law.  The Dowd&#039;s cannot seem to understand this.  




































































I do feel sorry for the Dowd&#039;s. Not because they lost a piece of investment property, but because of their weakness in human nature that led them to be so gullable to the fraudulant advice they were receiving from those with the least amount of knowledge.  The Dowd&#039;s were scammed by their own expert and associates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only shameful event in this Dowd situation is the fact that Mrs. Dowd had no faith in her own system of investing in rental properties.  Having been involved in their arbitration matter, as discovery progressed, it became overwhelming clear that they had absolutely no facts to back their claims.   Mrs. Dowd alleged she could not purchase other properties as a result of her credit being allegedly ruined by her mortgage servicer.  The facts came out that she had actually asked in writing to be let out of one purchase contract so she could get her deposit back.   Mrs. Dowd never told anyone about this up front.  Her only witness to her alleged credit destruction was a former mortgage broker that could not recall dates or times or events with reasonable accuracy.  A negotiated fair settlement obtained on the Dowd&#8217;s behalf in their arbitration would have removed all the derogatory credit information that her mortgage servicer had reported to the credit bureaus, the payment of her former attorney fees, a re-instatement of her mortgage loan and a cash payment on top of it all.  Mr. Dowd wanted to accept the offer and move on with their lives.  Mrs. Dowd refused as she wanted substantially more.   Mrs. Dowd was listening to her so called &#8220;expert&#8221; that was insisting they could get more.  This expert holds herself out to be a certified fraud examiner when in fact, she is nothing more than a fraud herself.  I have never seen a so called expert so misguided and uninformed in her area of expertise.  Her arrogant attitude combined with her lack of knowledge is why she has been discredited in numerous courts.   This certified fraud examiner continually ascertains opinions that are beyond her scope of knowledge and experience.  She is the result of why the Dowd&#8217;s lost their arbitration matter and the foreclosure suit in district court.  Her conclusions and facts were all wrong.</p>
<p>Had Mrs. Dowd had faith in her investment business, she could have taken the settlement and moved on and continued to purchase other investment properties and forget about getting rich in litigation. </p>
<p>The Dowd&#8217;s foreclosure is not on their personnel residence, but is on an investment rental property of which they own others.  Their personnel residence is not at risk.  </p>
<p>The Dowd&#8217;s and their certified fraud examiner cannot seem to understand that what underlies this entire foreclosure is a note and mortgage which clearly spells out the responsibilities of each party.  The foreclosure was the result of the mortgage servicer doing exactly what they were allowed to pursuant to the note and the law.  The Dowd&#8217;s cannot seem to understand this.  </p>
<p>I do feel sorry for the Dowd&#8217;s. Not because they lost a piece of investment property, but because of their weakness in human nature that led them to be so gullable to the fraudulant advice they were receiving from those with the least amount of knowledge.  The Dowd&#8217;s were scammed by their own expert and associates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What has happened to justice?</title>
		<link>http://therockwallnews.com/2009/1106/living/foreclosure-2/comment-page-1#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>What has happened to justice?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therockwallnews.com/?p=3641#comment-666</guid>
		<description>This is so shady...Lawyers like these are what gives &quot;real&quot; lawyers a bad name.  Its a clear sign of guilt when lawyers for the Mortgage Co. write comments on their own behalf AND do so under the name of the defendant&#039;s lawyer...
Sounds like our vets are getting the sham...  They serve our country for years helping us to continue in our Capitalistic Society...and then they get burned by those same Capitalists when they return home.  Its no wonder that we have so many foreclosures in the country right now...especially when the Mortgage Co. (who is in charge of handling the monthly payments) can &quot;wrongly&quot; force place insurance on your property and then REFUSE to apply your monthly payments...(until you are in forclosure status).  Shameful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so shady&#8230;Lawyers like these are what gives &#8220;real&#8221; lawyers a bad name.  Its a clear sign of guilt when lawyers for the Mortgage Co. write comments on their own behalf AND do so under the name of the defendant&#8217;s lawyer&#8230;<br />
Sounds like our vets are getting the sham&#8230;  They serve our country for years helping us to continue in our Capitalistic Society&#8230;and then they get burned by those same Capitalists when they return home.  Its no wonder that we have so many foreclosures in the country right now&#8230;especially when the Mortgage Co. (who is in charge of handling the monthly payments) can &#8220;wrongly&#8221; force place insurance on your property and then REFUSE to apply your monthly payments&#8230;(until you are in forclosure status).  Shameful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn</title>
		<link>http://therockwallnews.com/2009/1106/living/foreclosure-2/comment-page-1#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therockwallnews.com/?p=3641#comment-630</guid>
		<description>I personally guarantee all the above is true.  Attorney&#039;s for these mortgage companies should not hide their names Mr. Been There and also using someone elses name.  Shame on you.  How do you sleep at night.  Marilyn Mock</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally guarantee all the above is true.  Attorney&#8217;s for these mortgage companies should not hide their names Mr. Been There and also using someone elses name.  Shame on you.  How do you sleep at night.  Marilyn Mock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

